Built by a gastroenterologist, for gastroenterologists

Every biologic, ranked for the patient in front of you.

64 therapies, 38 evidence-based combinations. 5 guideline societies. 73 PMID-cited pivotal trials. The engine resolves them into one transparent, cited recommendation — in under 100 milliseconds.

Try the live consult See how it works
Decision support only — every recommendation cites its source.
102
Therapies evaluated
5
Guideline societies
17
Drug classes
73
PMID-cited pivotal trials
99.81%
Validation concordance
0
Safety escapes
The problem

Therapy selection is getting harder, not easier.

Approved IBD therapies have nearly doubled in three years. Every new comparative study redraws the map — and every patient sits somewhere different on it.

01

After anti-TNF failure

Risankizumab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, upadacitinib, guselkumab. Which ranks first here depends on phenotype, comorbidity and prior exposure.

02

Too many sources to reconcile

ECCO, AGA, ACG, BSG, DGVS — each society, its own wording. Published comparative analyses rarely crown the same winner.

03

Safety is combinatorial

Elderly with CV risk and latent TB. Pregnant and escalating. The contraindication checklist grows with every new approval.

04

One engine, all the evidence

Five societies’ guidelines and 73 cited trials, scored into a single ranked list. Not a black box.

How it works

Describe the patient. Get a ranked, cited answer.

Every therapy is scored against the specific clinical profile — disease, severity, Montreal classification, comorbidities, prior failures — and returned as a transparent ranking.

STEP 1

Describe the patient

UC or CD, severity, extent (E1–E3) or Montreal (A×L×B), prior failed therapies, comorbidities — TB, pregnancy, CV risk, renal function.

STEP 2

Safety gates run first

Active TB blocks biologics. Pregnancy blocks JAK inhibitors. Heart failure blocks anti-TNF. Before any ranking — no exceptions, no overrides.

STEP 3

Evidence, weighted

Five societies' guidelines and 73 PMID-cited pivotal trials are scored for this exact profile — efficacy, safety, onset, durability, route.

STEP 4

A ranked, cited answer

Therapies come back ranked with transparent scores. Every line traces to the guideline paragraph or trial that produced it.

Live consult

Run a consult right now.

Three anonymized profiles from the validation set. Pick one — the engine gates, scores and ranks in real time.

Synthetic demo profiles — decision support for licensed clinicians only.
ENGINE OUTPUT
{{ engineMs }}
✓ {{ g.label }} ✕ {{ g.label }} ! {{ g.label }}
{{ r.rank }}
{{ r.name }} {{ r.cls }}
{{ r.rationale }} {{ r.cite }}
{{ r.score }}
Evidence

Trusted sources in. Tested output out.

The engine doesn't invent medicine. It reconciles what the field already knows — and proves the output holds up.

Five societies, one weighting

ECCO AGA ACG BSG DGVS

Where guidelines disagree, both positions surface — with the weighting applied, in the open.

99.81%

Concordance in combinatorial validation

Across 50,000 combinatorially generated scenarios, the engine matched the expected guideline pathway in 99.81% of runs.

0

Safety escapes in validation

50,000 validation scenarios, zero contraindicated recommendations surfaced. Gates run before ranking — every time.

Who it's for

Built for the people making the call.

01

Community gastroenterology

A guideline-safe answer inside a 15-minute slot — citation ready for the chart.

02

IBD centers

Same evidence, same weighting, every clinician. Sequencing decisions you can defend in board review.

03

Fellows in training

See exactly why #1 outranks #2. The scoring is the curriculum.

Ready before your next complex consult.

Early access is open to licensed gastroenterologists and IBD centers.